The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes
    • The Product Book

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data and AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma and Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Content Hubs
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / Issues / 2026 / October / Stool Profiles Reveal Esophageal Cancer Clues
Mass Spectrometry Clinical News and Research

Stool Profiles Reveal Esophageal Cancer Clues

Metabolomic and microbiome analyses identify altered lipid pathways and gut bacteria

10/06/2026 3 min read

Share

Patients with esophageal cancer showed differences in fecal metabolites and gut bacteria compared with people without cancer, according to a study published in Scientific Reports. The findings may guide future biomarker research, but they do not establish a diagnostic test.

Researchers studied 34 patients with esophageal cancer and 29 controls matched for age, sex and dietary habits. The cancer group included patients with stages I through IV disease. Stool samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. They also measured five serum tumor markers: CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4, CYFRA21-1 and squamous cell carcinoma antigen.

For the metabolomic analysis, compounds were extracted from 20-milligram fecal samples and analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Data were collected in positive and negative ionization modes. Metabolites were identified by comparing their accurate mass and fragmentation spectra with an in-house database of authenticated standards.

The researchers identified 792 metabolites with different abundances between the two groups. The most prominent changes involved fatty acid, amino acid, and nucleic acid metabolism. Lipid-related findings included altered levels of oleic, linoleic, dodecanoic, and stearic acids. The study also identified changes in phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine, which are important components of cell membranes.

Pathway analysis highlighted fatty acid transport, linoleic acid metabolism, and lipid regulation involving peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha. An exploratory comparison across cancer stages also identified a group of metabolites associated mainly with lipid metabolism.

Microbiome sequencing generated approximately 6.5 million valid reads, averaging more than 103,000 per sample. Several measures of microbial richness and diversity differed between the cancer and control groups.

At the genus level, bacteria including Akkermansia, Dialister, and Prevotella were more abundant in the cancer group in comparative analyses. Other bacteria, including Bacteroides, Romboutsia, and Fusicatenibacter, were more abundant among controls.

The researchers used PICRUSt2 to predict possible microbial functions from the 16S sequencing data. The analysis suggested differences in pathways associated with steroid and fatty acid biosynthesis, glycerolipid metabolism, and amino and nucleotide sugars. These results represent computational predictions rather than direct measurements of microbial genes or activity.

Correlation analysis also linked several bacterial groups with metabolites involved in lipid, indole, and nucleoside metabolism. However, these associations do not show that microbial changes caused the metabolic differences or contributed directly to cancer development.

The study has several limitations. It included only 63 participants from one hospital, and the small number of patients in each cancer stage limited the progression analysis. The cross-sectional design could not determine whether the observed changes developed before or after the cancer.

Patients in the cancer group had also received treatments including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or combined regimens. These treatments may have affected their microbiomes and metabolism. Dysphagia, malnutrition, and dietary changes associated with advanced disease could also explain some findings.

In addition, 16S sequencing generally identified bacteria only to the genus level. The study did not develop or independently validate a diagnostic model or report sensitivity and specificity.

Larger prospective studies involving untreated patients and early-stage disease are needed to determine whether fecal metabolites or microbial profiles could complement endoscopy and tissue biopsy. Future work will also need to assess analytical reproducibility, potential confounders, and performance in independent populations.

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

 This Week’s Mass Spec News
Mass Spectrometry
This Week’s Mass Spec News

April 4, 2025

2 min read

 What If Computers Could Smell?
Mass Spectrometry
What If Computers Could Smell?

April 3, 2025

13 min read

Computers can “see” and “hear,” but fully digitizing scent has so far eluded science – but that may soon change

The Analytical Scientist Innovation Awards 2024: #6
Mass Spectrometry
The Analytical Scientist Innovation Awards 2024: #6

December 3, 2024

3 min read

Syft Technologies’ William Pelet introduces the Syft Explorer – the world's first fully mobile, real-time, and direct trace gas analyzer

The Analytical Scientist Innovation Awards 2024: #4
Mass Spectrometry
The Analytical Scientist Innovation Awards 2024: #4

December 5, 2024

6 min read

Thermo Fisher Scientific’s high-sensitivity mass spec for translational omics research – the Stellar MS – is ranked 4th in our annual Innovation Awards

Affiliations:

Specialties:

Areas of Expertise:

Contributions:

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.