The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes
    • The Product Book

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data and AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma and Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Content Hubs
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / Issues / 2026 / November / MSI’s Resolution-Fragmentation Trade-Off
Mass Spectrometry News and Research

MSI’s Resolution-Fragmentation Trade-Off

Researchers map the physical forces shaping impingement-based mass spectrometry imaging

11/10/2026 2 min read

Share

Researchers have developed a physics-based framework for predicting how molecules are extracted from samples during impingement-based mass spectrometry imaging. The model is intended to help scientists understand the trade-offs among spatial resolution, molecular coverage, and ionization softness when selecting or optimizing an imaging method.

Mass spectrometry imaging maps the spatial distribution of lipids, metabolites, peptides, proteins, and other molecules within cells and tissues. Several MSI techniques use droplets, particles, or liquid probes to remove analytes from a sample before ionization and mass analysis.

John C. Sentmanat and Andrei G. Fedorov of the Georgia Institute of Technology divided these extraction processes into two main regimes: thermodynamic, or passive, desorption, and kinematic, or active, extraction.

Thermodynamic desorption occurs when molecules move into a solvent because of favorable chemical interactions. Desorption electrospray ionization is one example. Its liquid film can reduce molecular fragmentation, making the method suitable for fragile biomolecules. However, extraction depends on analyte solubility and solvent choice, while surface wetting can restrict spatial resolution.

Kinematic extraction uses the energy from high-speed particles or droplets to overcome the forces holding molecules within the sample. Techniques operating mainly in this regime include electrospray droplet impact, gas cluster ion beam, and massive cluster impact secondary ion mass spectrometry.

The researchers created a dimensionless parameter, Πσ, that compares the stress generated during particle impact with the cohesive forces binding molecules to the sample. The model predicts that kinematic extraction can begin when Πσ is equal to or greater than 1. Below this threshold, extraction is expected to be primarily thermodynamic. Values close to 1 indicate a mixed regime in which both mechanisms may contribute.

The framework also considers particle charge and mass, accelerating voltage, travel distance, aerodynamic drag, and inertia. The analysis indicated that active extraction becomes possible only when the electric force accelerating a particle exceeds the combined effects of drag and inertia.

When applied to representative operating conditions reported for existing MSI methods, the model placed atmospheric-pressure DESI within the thermodynamic regime. Vacuum-based electrospray droplet impact and cluster-ion techniques were assigned mainly to the kinematic regime. Nano-DESI and liquid microjunction surface sampling were also estimated to operate thermodynamically, although the authors cautioned that the model provides only a qualitative approximation for methods without impinging particles.

High Πσ values were associated with a greater likelihood of molecular fragmentation. However, the parameter does not directly predict ionization softness because fragmentation also depends on ionization chemistry, molecular structure, energy redistribution, and the local sample environment.

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

 This Week’s Mass Spec News
Mass Spectrometry
This Week’s Mass Spec News

April 4, 2025

2 min read

 What If Computers Could Smell?
Mass Spectrometry
What If Computers Could Smell?

April 3, 2025

13 min read

Computers can “see” and “hear,” but fully digitizing scent has so far eluded science – but that may soon change

The Analytical Scientist Innovation Awards 2024: #6
Mass Spectrometry
The Analytical Scientist Innovation Awards 2024: #6

December 3, 2024

3 min read

Syft Technologies’ William Pelet introduces the Syft Explorer – the world's first fully mobile, real-time, and direct trace gas analyzer

The Analytical Scientist Innovation Awards 2024: #4
Mass Spectrometry
The Analytical Scientist Innovation Awards 2024: #4

December 5, 2024

6 min read

Thermo Fisher Scientific’s high-sensitivity mass spec for translational omics research – the Stellar MS – is ranked 4th in our annual Innovation Awards

Affiliations:

Specialties:

Areas of Expertise:

Contributions:

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.