Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes
    • The Product Book

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data and AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma and Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Content Hubs
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / Issues / 2026 / February / Why Clean Cannabis May Not Be Clean
Forensics Mass Spectrometry News and Research

Why “Clean” Cannabis May Not Be Clean 

A multi-method study finds fungal spores, DNA, and mycotoxins persisting in irradiated cannabis 

02/04/2026 2 min read

Share

Gamma irradiation, widely used to reduce microbial contamination in medicinal and recreational cannabis, does not fully eliminate toxic fungi or their chemical residues, according to a new study from McGill University. The findings suggest that current sterilization and testing practices may underestimate contamination risks, particularly for immunocompromised users. 

The study examined dried cannabis buds subjected to gamma irradiation, alongside non-irradiated material and commercially available products from licensed producers. Gamma irradiation is intended to inactivate microorganisms by damaging DNA and RNA and is commonly applied to meet regulatory microbial limits. While the treatment substantially reduced overall microbial load, the researchers found that it did not achieve complete sterilization. 

Using a combination of microbiological and analytical approaches, the team detected viable spores from mycotoxigenic fungi, fragments of fungal DNA, and residual mycotoxins in irradiated samples. The persistence of these contaminants is notable, the authors point out, given that most cannabis is consumed by smoking or vaping, which may deliver spores or toxins directly to lung tissue. 

To assess contamination, the researchers applied three complementary methods. Culture-based assays were used to identify viable fungi and bacteria; molecular techniques, including PCR and quantitative PCR (qPCR), targeted fungal DNA and genes associated with mycotoxin biosynthesis; and antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) were used to quantify toxins such as aflatoxins and ochratoxins. 

Culture-based testing showed that irradiation eliminated detectable bacteria but not all fungi, with mycotoxigenic genera including Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Fusarium persisting after treatment. Molecular analyses revealed that mycotoxin-related genes remained detectable after irradiation, indicating that DNA damage did not equate to complete degradation. ELISA measurements confirmed the presence of residual mycotoxins in irradiated samples and in products that had passed routine regulatory testing. 

The authors report that ELISA, when used alone, may lack the sensitivity needed to detect trace residues following irradiation, and that similar limitations can apply to mass spectrometry when used in isolation. Combining culture-based, molecular, and immunological methods provided a more complete assessment of contamination than any single approach.

“A single spore can cause disease, so we had to go beyond the ELISA limit to see,” said Saji George, senior author of the study. “To the general population, this may not have much significance, but immunocompromised people will be at much higher risk.” 

The researchers emphasize that preventing contamination during cultivation and processing may be more effective than relying on post-harvest sterilization alone. “We need stricter safety standards, especially for medicinal cannabis,” George said. 

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

How Dinosaurs Ate Their Way to Dominance
Forensics
How Dinosaurs Ate Their Way to Dominance

December 10, 2024

2 min read

Analyses of fossilized feces, intestinal contents, and vomit reveal how dinosaurs adapted to climate shifts

New Window into Ancient Microfossils
Forensics
New Window into Ancient Microfossils

October 4, 2024

1 min read

A new imaging technique using specially coated indium tin oxide (ITO) glass slides reveals key bioessential elements in ancient microfossils – suggesting that life 1...

New Window Into Ancient Microfossils: Part Two
Forensics
New Window Into Ancient Microfossils: Part Two

October 11, 2024

8 min read

Why the discovery of indium tin oxide glass slides ultimately led Akizumi Ishida and Kohei Sasaki to shed new light on early life on Earth – and to jump for joy

Mystery Solved: These Iron Age Infants Died of Natural Causes
Forensics
Mystery Solved: These Iron Age Infants Died of Natural Causes

October 17, 2024

5 min read

Ani Martirosyan walks us through her histological and synchrotron X-ray analysis that provides new insights into infant mortality in Iron Age Iberian populations

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.