Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data and AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma and Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Content Hubs
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / Issues / 2025 / August / The Dark Lab Approaches
Data and AI Opinion & Personal Narratives

The “Dark Lab” Approaches 

Why a fully automated analytical laboratory might be closer than you think

By Thorsten Teutenberg 08/15/2025 3 min read

Share

China is rapidly becoming the world leader in industrial automation. Take Xiaomi, for example, which has invested approximately $330 million in a fully autonomous “dark factory” that operates 24/7 to produce smartphones. In stark contrast, most analytical laboratories – at least the ones I know, primarily in Europe – function much the same as they did a century ago. The idea of a “dark analytical lab” might sound far-fetched, especially in the face of looming cuts to public research and development funding across much of the Western world, but I believe that a fully, or at least highly, automated analytical lab is closer than it seems.

Thorsten Teutenberg

My optimism stems from firsthand experience. About eight years ago, I read an article by a scientist who claimed that it was possible to program a robot using intuitive software. I don’t remember the scientist's name or the journal, but I do recall being deeply impressed and enthralled. Eight years later, we have demonstrated that a domain expert in the field of analytical chemistry can actually automate a highly complex analytical workflow. This achievement is particularly gratifying given that one of our initial project proposals was rejected by a reviewer who questioned our core innovation – and our team’s competence in lab automation altogether! Nevertheless, we managed to secure funding for this project in a subsequent call.

With that experience in mind, I am convinced that we can achieve a “dark lab” within the next decade, in both academia and industry. However, to make this a reality, we must address the connectivity issue. Instrument and software vendors need to embrace standardized communication protocols at scale. Thankfully, we don’t need to wait – standards such as SiLA 2 (Standardization in Laboratory Automation) and LADS OPC UA (Laboratory and Analytical Device Standard Open Platform Communication Unified Architecture) are already available and built on non-proprietary frameworks. When devices support such universal standards, seamless data flow becomes possible – paving the way for the “AI party.”

When we began exploring lab automation, we focused on building automated workflows using intuitive, drag-and-drop software. These systems are composed of modular building blocks – each one representing a specific task like moving a robotic arm or opening a gripper.

The next frontier? The ability to interact with the robot via a large language model (LLM). I really believe this is the future. I’d love to be able to talk to all my instruments and discuss my lab data with an AI lab agent! We could then also apply this concept to workflow orchestration. Currently, the lab execution system we use requires at least some basic programming and coding skills. But in the near future, it might become easier to create digital SOPs by simple drag-and-drop tools – or even by prompting an LLM.

Critics point out that this won’t work because LLMs have inherent flaws, such as hallucination. While this is true, the same applies to human experts – their answers must be analyzed carefully, too! Rather than replacing experts, AI will help us accelerate and refine the insights we draw from our experiments.

In addition, some question whether full automation makes sense in dynamic environments like R&D labs, where methods are continuously developed and adapted. Although this complexity is real, we should not be content with the fact that some of our best-trained students and scientists are still scribbling notes in paper lab notebooks. Surely we can do better.

Let's work together to make the dark lab a reality – not to replace human scientists, but to free them from tedious tasks. Let's focus on the output and give more credit to the data produced by our high-end analytical instruments. Some may strongly oppose this, but I look forward to engaging in a lively discussion so that we can develop systems that are easier to use, more flexible, and offer a variety of options for assessing data quality based on their built-in sensors.

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

About the Author(s)

Thorsten Teutenberg

Thorsten Teutenberg studied Chemistry at Ruhr University Bochum. Here he studied for a doctorate in Analytical Chemistry, submitting a thesis on “High-temperature HPLC”. In 2004, his career took him to the Institute of Energy and Environmental Technology (IUTA) in Duisburg as a research associate. Since 2012 he has been in charge of the Research Analysis Department, mainly working on the various aspects of high-temperature HPLC, miniaturized separation and detection techniques, and multi-dimensional chromatography processes.

More Articles by Thorsten Teutenberg

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

The Analytical Scientist Innovation Awards 2024: #5
Data and AI
The Analytical Scientist Innovation Awards 2024: #5

December 4, 2024

4 min read

Welcome to the 5th ranked Innovation, Pyxis – introduced here by Matterworks co-founder Jack Geremia

The Climate Conversation: Part Two – Michael Gonsior
Data and AI
The Climate Conversation: Part Two – Michael Gonsior

December 5, 2024

7 min read

In the second part of our interview, Michael Gonsior explores the pressing challenges in carbon cycle research, transformative tools and technologies, as well as analytical glimmers of hope

Green is Digital
Data and AI
Green is Digital

December 16, 2024

4 min read

Software tools can optimize resource management, streamline workflow processes, predict outcomes, and optimize experimental conditions – contributing to more sustainable laboratory operations

Could AI Ever Replace The Analytical Scientist?
Data and AI
Could AI Ever Replace The Analytical Scientist?

December 18, 2024

1 min read

Working closely with an ever-expanding network of experts helps keep our content relevant and engaging. And keeps artificial intelligence at bay, right?!

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.